What do you
think of when you hear a word spoken? Is it different if you hear the word in
isolation, or hear it as part of a description? Can you think about it without
altering what you think of?
So if I said "cat", would you think of this?
Or this? cat
This is not
in any way a scientific piece, but it is prompted in part by something I
realised a little while ago; asking friends and family, I have found two
distinct responses to the first question posed above. The first group of people
see the word itself, usually printed in black on white paper; some people saw
the same font every time, for others the font changed depending on the word
itself, or other factors. The second group see an image: either still like a
snapshot, or moving like a video, or sometimes an immensely quick visual
collage of images, both still and moving.
I discovered these two responses as a result of a problem which developed during my post-natal
depression. One of the things that plagued me then (and which still
lingers and flares up when I’m tired and vulnerable), was my mind’s ability to
conjure up very real and graphic images or “videos” when I heard or read
something unpleasant or violent. So hearing about Baby P, for example, gave me
mental images of a tiny child screaming in pain, bruises all over his body.
This in turn triggered a physical distress response so that I felt some of the same physical sensations of distress that I would feel if I really
witnessed someone harming a child (a sick feeling in my
stomach, adrenalin surging through me, fear, anxiety, fury, etc). It was the same with anything
distressing on the news, or in a novel, or even just a chance comment. It has largely faded now, and I have learnt some strategies to control the images, but it's still there: my mind still responds very visually and viscerally to language. It also affects my interpretation and response to everyday sights - seeing a field of yellow rape flowering, there is a part of my brain that begins a distress response to the idea of the act of rape.
One book in
particular, “Mister Pip”, gave me waking nightmares for several years about the
denouement (which, without spoiling the whole book, involves a scene of gang
rape, two people being hacked to pieces with machetes and fed to the village
pigs, and the torturing of a mentally disabled child to death; and by the way,
the Times newspaper reviewer who said this book was about the “redeeming power”
of Dickens clearly hadn’t read it to the end, and should be struck off immediately.)
I began to be much, much more careful about what
I read, sticking by and large to the classics, things I'd read before so I knew
they were “safe”, and children’s books. I stopped watching the news, or
listening to it on the radio, and bought newspapers only for the magazine and
culture sections. I cut out most TV dramas, and any films with a 15 or 18 certificate; and I still don’t open a book if it has words
like “gritty”, “hard-hitting”, “tragic”, or “violent” on the cover blurb.
But still
things get through, and my husband is occasionally the guilty party for
casually mentioning something he’s seen, in language that then causes this
distress response in me. When I challenged him, he was surprised by my
response: he, I discovered, is one of that first group of people who just see
the word(s) on paper, black on white, without any emotional connotation at all. Until that conversation, I hadn't realised this was even possible. Sometimes when
he’s listening to something he’ll actually be analysing the syntax, rather than
becoming involved in the meaning (and I get very cross when he does this to
something I’m saying – he should be listening to what I mean, not being pedantic about the way I’m saying it!), whereas my response is almost always more visceral. I constantly puzzle
over the way so many people seem to find violence a suitable, even
relaxing, subject for entertainment, when to me, it always feels
personal, real, brutal and horrible in every way.
What about you? What do you think of or see in your mind when you hear a word? If you are a visual person, do you also have difficulty watching or reading about violence, or do you think this is a separate issue? Do let
me know, using the comments below. Thanks!
And before
I finish, I’d like to do a shout out for Mental Health Awareness Week –
happening this week, 21-27 May 2012. You can find out more about it here.
What I find fascinating is that you make the connection between the act of rape and oilseed rape flowers. The linguistic connection you don't think you have along the pathway ear-brain-visualisation is clearly there in the pathway eye-brain-aural. Isn't the mind extraordinary?
ReplyDeleteI tend to 'see' words that I hear, but when I read words they definitely aren't void of emotional connotation and they generate strong images. Thanks for the Mister Pip spoiler - I had heard of it and now I know not to read it! I too stick to the classics, but I found Germinal pretty distressing.
As you say, the mind is extraordinary, and the more I think about it, the more complicated it seems. In recent experiments, I've discovered some words (often more abstract ones) where I see the word itself in front of a collage of related images - so I get both!
DeleteI've never read Germinal, and now know not to try... Thank you.